Based on my experience, the article contains a lot of misinformation. Some of the statements might have been true at one point in the past, but are now out of date by years, while others have never been true in the time I've been around.
Without getting into a point-by-point rebuttal, my reaction to each section/Exhibit is "that's wrong/misleading".
Without getting into a point-by-point rebuttal, my reaction to each section/Exhibit is "that's wrong/misleading".