yes, I'll try to sum up the article as i understand:
* better process isolation
* stable hw/driver api (this is a huge mistake in linux, agreed)
* less historical craziness(who likes fork()?)
* more micro-kernel
some of the things I personally cannot buy:
* vulkan native. android is not vulkan-native, it provides both opengl es and vulkan, for your choice
* flutter. why bundling and bringing opinions to the system becomes a benefit? it was a major problem with android that you have to interact with java if you want any native ui => I would prefer more ways/languages/bindings to interop with the UI
* fidl ipc. cool, again, why bundling something with the os?
* vDSO. why is even vdso on the slides - vdso is important, but it already with us for a decade.
This article is great because its one of the first that breaks down Fuchsia on a tech level. But at the same time, its not an article that explains all the reasons the fuchsia is better that what google have now.
* better process isolation
* stable hw/driver api (this is a huge mistake in linux, agreed)
* less historical craziness(who likes fork()?)
* more micro-kernel
some of the things I personally cannot buy:
* vulkan native. android is not vulkan-native, it provides both opengl es and vulkan, for your choice
* flutter. why bundling and bringing opinions to the system becomes a benefit? it was a major problem with android that you have to interact with java if you want any native ui => I would prefer more ways/languages/bindings to interop with the UI
* fidl ipc. cool, again, why bundling something with the os?
* vDSO. why is even vdso on the slides - vdso is important, but it already with us for a decade.
This article is great because its one of the first that breaks down Fuchsia on a tech level. But at the same time, its not an article that explains all the reasons the fuchsia is better that what google have now.