> In October, California agreed not to enforce its own state net neutrality law until the appeals court’s decision on the 2017 repeal, and any potential review by the U.S. Supreme Court
That was one positive "states rights" thing I was looking forward to, but they chickened out? It's their state law, why not enforce it.
It's also been some time so it would be good to see how the predictions panned out. Some of those were pretty grim:
> "That means if Bing offers Comcast a hefty penny, you’ll never make another Google search for as long as you live. Yeah, it’s that bad."
I can't say I have seen any changes in the 2 or 3 services I have. It could be because there are competitors in the region and they'd be afraid to rock to boat too much. Maybe in other parts it was much worse.
That was one positive "states rights" thing I was looking forward to, but they chickened out? It's their state law, why not enforce it.
It's also been some time so it would be good to see how the predictions panned out. Some of those were pretty grim:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/net-neutrality-in-2017-... [warning: auto-playing video]
> "That means if Bing offers Comcast a hefty penny, you’ll never make another Google search for as long as you live. Yeah, it’s that bad."
I can't say I have seen any changes in the 2 or 3 services I have. It could be because there are competitors in the region and they'd be afraid to rock to boat too much. Maybe in other parts it was much worse.