I was under the impression that it's mostly that it's really hart to reliably support e.g. calling 'gnupg' (cmdline), gpgme (library), etc.?
ISTR there was a company that's re-implementing the OpenPGP standard from scratch in a library-oriented-fashion, but for the life of me I can't remember their name...
I don't disagree with the 'drop legacy' stance, btw, I'm just interested in what exactly the issue is.
I was under the impression that it's mostly that it's really hart to reliably support e.g. calling 'gnupg' (cmdline), gpgme (library), etc.?
ISTR there was a company that's re-implementing the OpenPGP standard from scratch in a library-oriented-fashion, but for the life of me I can't remember their name...
I don't disagree with the 'drop legacy' stance, btw, I'm just interested in what exactly the issue is.