If someone want to convince me that climate change is the biggest threat to humanity they need to explain to me what scientifically demonstrated consequences of climate change are we currently not able to deal with and won't we be able to deal with 50-100 year from now.
Climate change will happen whether we emit CO2 or not and we always have to find ways to co-exist with that fact.
But the idea that climate change is catastrophic to the extent a sudden impact from an astroid is just not convincing and it's certainly not scientific no matter how many scientist are behind that view.
"threat to humanity" is a big concept and it's disheartening to see it being thrown around with regards to climate so easily.
My position on this is that we start taking care of our close environments rather than worrying about climate change as that's not something we can really do anything about (and no solar and wind will not solve our problems)
The current debate about climate change is politics masquaraded as science.
Until we accept this we can't have a constructive debate.
Climate change will happen whether we emit CO2 or not and we always have to find ways to co-exist with that fact.
But the idea that climate change is catastrophic to the extent a sudden impact from an astroid is just not convincing and it's certainly not scientific no matter how many scientist are behind that view.
"threat to humanity" is a big concept and it's disheartening to see it being thrown around with regards to climate so easily.
My position on this is that we start taking care of our close environments rather than worrying about climate change as that's not something we can really do anything about (and no solar and wind will not solve our problems)
The current debate about climate change is politics masquaraded as science.
Until we accept this we can't have a constructive debate.