> The monorepo third-party system works well in practice.
It's worth noting that this is only viable at Google because they don't use git. Git's insistence on every client having a full copy of all history of every file in the repository makes monorepo much more expensive.
I see conflicting reports over whether google use Perforce or something proprietary called "piper"?
It's worth noting that this is only viable at Google because they don't use git. Git's insistence on every client having a full copy of all history of every file in the repository makes monorepo much more expensive.
I see conflicting reports over whether google use Perforce or something proprietary called "piper"?