Comment

Comment by weinzierl

What I don't understand is how they accomplish larger collaborative changes. The paper says:

"Almost all development occurs at the 'head' of the repository, not on branches."

Googler Rachel Potvin made an even stronger statement in her presentation about "The Motivation for a Monolithic Codebase" [1]:

"Branching for development at Google is exceedingly rare [..]"

In the related ACM paper she published with Josh Levenberg there is the statement that:

"Development on branches is unusual and not well supported at Google, though branches are typically used for releases."

I my world when we have to make a bigger change we create a branch and only merge it into the trunk when it is good enough to be integrated. The branch enables us to work on that change together. I don't understand how they do this at google. As far as I understand in their model they either have to

- give up on collaboration and always have just a single developer work on a change.

- share code by other means.

- check in unfinished work to the trunk for collaboration and constantly break trunk.

[1] https://youtu.be/W71BTkUbdqE?t=904

[2] https://cacm.acm.org/magazines/2016/7/204032-why-google-stor...

parent weinzierl 7 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton