> even if one source is factual and the Daily Stormer is…
I think it's disingenuous to use the Daily Stormer here as an example. I have definitely come across publications on the left that play loose with the facts or have unlikely explanations for directly observable facts.
It would be more fair to use something like PragerU:
I think it's disingenuous to use the Daily Stormer here as an example. I have definitely come across publications on the left that play loose with the facts or have unlikely explanations for directly observable facts.
It would be more fair to use something like PragerU:
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-45247302