> A British government spokeswoman declined to comment on the identities of companies affected by the Cloudhopper campaign or the impact of those breaches.
> “A number of MSPs have been affected, and naming them would have potential commercial consequences for them, putting them at an unfair disadvantage to their competitors,” she said.
Wait, what? These companies got repeatedly hacked, were apparently not able to re-secure the network, allowed themselves to be used as a springboard for further attacks to their customers, and then covered it up. And letting this be known would be an "unfair disadvantage"?
> “A number of MSPs have been affected, and naming them would have potential commercial consequences for them, putting them at an unfair disadvantage to their competitors,” she said.
Wait, what? These companies got repeatedly hacked, were apparently not able to re-secure the network, allowed themselves to be used as a springboard for further attacks to their customers, and then covered it up. And letting this be known would be an "unfair disadvantage"?