I am not sure I understand the criticism of RLS. It feels to me that the Language Server Protocol does allow for incremental parsing etc. In particular, the approach taken by rust-analyzer
> Analyzer maintains a "database" of input facts (source code + information about project structure) and derived facts (syntax trees, name resolution information, types). The client then can change input facts, and query derived facts at the current state of the world.
seems that it could also be adopted by a language sever for Rust.
> Analyzer maintains a "database" of input facts (source code + information about project structure) and derived facts (syntax trees, name resolution information, types). The client then can change input facts, and query derived facts at the current state of the world.
seems that it could also be adopted by a language sever for Rust.