Comment Comment by benj111 So it cost $66 million and saved $40 million.That's impressive. I assume most of the saving is from grid stabilisation, rather than supplying/storing energy but still.Why is this not more wide spread? These figures suggest this is a no brainer. Am I missing something? parent benj111 8 years ago
That's impressive. I assume most of the saving is from grid stabilisation, rather than supplying/storing energy but still.
Why is this not more wide spread? These figures suggest this is a no brainer. Am I missing something?