I have to call BS. This argument that third parties split the vote is nonsense.
Me voting for a third-party candidate is does not imply that I would have voted for any other candidate had they not been on the ballot. Had that candidate not been on the ballot, I would have abstained from that particular position.
It's like the BSA argument that people who steal software (yes it's stealing) would have normally bought the software. No, they wouldn't have.
Me voting for a third-party candidate is does not imply that I would have voted for any other candidate had they not been on the ballot. Had that candidate not been on the ballot, I would have abstained from that particular position.
It's like the BSA argument that people who steal software (yes it's stealing) would have normally bought the software. No, they wouldn't have.