How many servers are needed to achieve this throughput?
2) >4 terabytes of unreplicated, frequently accessed data
4TB unreplicated data? Does that mean if a single node goes down you'll lose data (EDIT: I meant losing availability, not data)? That kinda ruins the whole point of having a distributed database.
3) If I'm reading the KV benchmaks correctly, it takes 5 nodes to achieve 100k tpm. That's 20k tpm per node. That's 333 tps per node. This is a 95% point read benchmark. Why is the tps (333 tps) so low? Is that normal?
4) How does CockroachDB compare to other distributed databases such as TiDB, FoundationDB, ScyllaDB?
1) >631851 tpmC
How many servers are needed to achieve this throughput?
2) >4 terabytes of unreplicated, frequently accessed data
4TB unreplicated data? Does that mean if a single node goes down you'll lose data (EDIT: I meant losing availability, not data)? That kinda ruins the whole point of having a distributed database.
3) If I'm reading the KV benchmaks correctly, it takes 5 nodes to achieve 100k tpm. That's 20k tpm per node. That's 333 tps per node. This is a 95% point read benchmark. Why is the tps (333 tps) so low? Is that normal?
4) How does CockroachDB compare to other distributed databases such as TiDB, FoundationDB, ScyllaDB?