They say that most accidents are a sequence of several failures, but from what's in this article it sure seems
to me like 100% Boeing's fault.
If the only maintainence problem with this aircraft was a broken sensor, then that is almost irrelevant because sensors can break during flight too.
If it's really true that a mere broken sensor can cause the computer to ram the aircraft into the sea, then someone at Boeing really fucked up. Where are the redundancies and sanity checks?
If the only maintainence problem with this aircraft was a broken sensor, then that is almost irrelevant because sensors can break during flight too.
If it's really true that a mere broken sensor can cause the computer to ram the aircraft into the sea, then someone at Boeing really fucked up. Where are the redundancies and sanity checks?