We are quite confident that 2.0 can meet all the customer needs of 1.0, but going far beyond in terms of scalability, at a much lower cost.
A great example of this is "doing work in a loop". Sure, you can spin up a process and try to schedule work yourself. At that point you're responsible for monitoring, and addressing all its failure modes.
In the 2.0 world-view, you can delegate a lot of the tough synchronization and scalability problems to the platform instead.
A great example of this is "doing work in a loop". Sure, you can spin up a process and try to schedule work yourself. At that point you're responsible for monitoring, and addressing all its failure modes.
In the 2.0 world-view, you can delegate a lot of the tough synchronization and scalability problems to the platform instead.