Why do you want to cite the legality of 2nd generation voters voting, but not cit the illegality of their parents coming here?
It's not fair to embrace law breaking when the consequences disenfranchise 1 party, 1 ideology, along w/ the pressure it applies to wages and social services demands.
I'm quite simply stating, it is unfair to turn your back on law breaking that may benefit some people (and of course certainly benefits the immigrant) while harming others, who happen to be citizens the law is designed to protect.
Can you articulate to me why you think we even have a law against illegal immigration, before you dismiss my point of view out of hand?
It's not fair to embrace law breaking when the consequences disenfranchise 1 party, 1 ideology, along w/ the pressure it applies to wages and social services demands.
I'm quite simply stating, it is unfair to turn your back on law breaking that may benefit some people (and of course certainly benefits the immigrant) while harming others, who happen to be citizens the law is designed to protect.
Can you articulate to me why you think we even have a law against illegal immigration, before you dismiss my point of view out of hand?