I am not an expert bill reader but seems like this loophole is covered as there is another point that says :
"(ii) is not substantially owned, oper
ated, or controlled by a person, partner
ship, or corporation that does not meet the
6 requirements under clause"
"(ii) is not substantially owned, oper ated, or controlled by a person, partner ship, or corporation that does not meet the 6 requirements under clause"