Comment

Comment by wellpast

I was interviewed recently. I was asked to implement a solution in Java. It was essentially a stack-based computation engine. The interviewer posed a question and there were enough tacit hints for me to see what he really wanted: an "OO" approach using a type hierarchy + command pattern. He offered unsolicited prompts and I took them: I coupled the command objects to the engine. He liked that.

What we ended up with was O(n) _classes_ (where n = the number of computation operations).

I remained in Java, but took a functional and dynamic approach yielding a three-line implementation of the engine where each command was simply a function. All the tests passed.

I was kind of holding my breath at this point. What will he say? We just went from this huge implementation to three lines. I thought he was going to love it. The crazy simplicity of it all.

But to my draw-dropping surprise he muttered something about adding new types and how he liked that the commands were coupled to the engine.

Is this complexity worship? Or what is this? It's almost as if his brain was refusing to see the solution. Like it couldn't possibly believe that the solution could be that simple. So it just ejected it, put a big black censorship block over it.

I'm currently reading a book on brain hemispheres. Apparently experiments have shown that the left hemisphere will completely and blatantly reject obvious evidence even if the right hemisphere 'has a clear counter proof'. Sometimes I think our industry suffers from an abundance of left hemispheric dominance. Or something like this...

parent wellpast 8 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton