> the scale of their direct malfeasance is mostly regional
This is patently incorrect.
1. There Wahabi radical islamic movement was largely funded by SA at it's inception. SA continues to be it's largest donor, both in money and security. This movement has brought the world the 9/11 attacks, Al Queda, terrorism world wide, and has radicalised liberal Islamic populations.
2. They're brutalistic about Shias - i.e. they refuse Shias (from Syria) refugee status, and continue funding any military action that targets Shias.
3. They play a central role in money laundering of terrorist funds.
If there ever was one country to blame for today's international unstable, religion fueled geopolitical mess, it would be SA.
This is patently incorrect.
1. There Wahabi radical islamic movement was largely funded by SA at it's inception. SA continues to be it's largest donor, both in money and security. This movement has brought the world the 9/11 attacks, Al Queda, terrorism world wide, and has radicalised liberal Islamic populations.
2. They're brutalistic about Shias - i.e. they refuse Shias (from Syria) refugee status, and continue funding any military action that targets Shias.
3. They play a central role in money laundering of terrorist funds.
If there ever was one country to blame for today's international unstable, religion fueled geopolitical mess, it would be SA.