Curious what you mean by this (especially since no one had even commented when you said it). Do you mean because the article was up voted? Isn't what makes HN great is that we look at the data and seek empirical evidence, and not just take action based on emotion?
This article is a clear refutation of a commonly held misbelief (or worse). Unfortunately it was dropped from the front page almost immediately, without commentary.
This article is a clear refutation of a commonly held misbelief (or worse). Unfortunately it was dropped from the front page almost immediately, without commentary.