WRT your claim that Kavanaugh somehow will not contribute to the prohibition (or extreme restriction) of abortions:
- Kavanaugh was nominated after private meetings with a president who promised to put anti-abortion judges on the court.
- The president himself is not an expert on jurisprudence and selected Kavanaugh from a list of anti-abortion judges provided to him by the Federalist Society, which vets judges with respect to the likelihood of their restricting abortion access.
- There is a lot of wiggle room within the phrase "I would follow Roe v. Wade faithfully and fully", enough to permit a decision that would allow states to effectively outlaw abortion. He could technically not be lying in that specific statement, yet still prohibit or largely restrict access to abortions.
There is no good faith reason to believe that Kavanaugh's nomination is not a threat to abortion access in America.
- Kavanaugh was nominated after private meetings with a president who promised to put anti-abortion judges on the court.
- The president himself is not an expert on jurisprudence and selected Kavanaugh from a list of anti-abortion judges provided to him by the Federalist Society, which vets judges with respect to the likelihood of their restricting abortion access.
- There is a lot of wiggle room within the phrase "I would follow Roe v. Wade faithfully and fully", enough to permit a decision that would allow states to effectively outlaw abortion. He could technically not be lying in that specific statement, yet still prohibit or largely restrict access to abortions.
There is no good faith reason to believe that Kavanaugh's nomination is not a threat to abortion access in America.