Point taken! Thanks a lot for your feedback.
Just a few points:
* pypeline is already taken :(
* My main reason for this was because initially I was thinking that you did an `import pypeln as pl` and then called things like e.g. `pl.pr.map` since you cant abbreviate the module inside `pl` then I picked short names, but then I decided to go for and import the module kind of strategy.
I am thinking about expanding the module names to their worker names:
* pr --> process
* th --> thread
* io --> task
And then have the conventions
* from pypeln import process as pr
* from pypeln import thread as th
* from pypeln import task as io # as ta?
This conversation is very valuable, thank you all for the feedback.
I am thinking about expanding the module names to their worker names: * pr --> process * th --> thread * io --> task
And then have the conventions * from pypeln import process as pr * from pypeln import thread as th * from pypeln import task as io # as ta?
This conversation is very valuable, thank you all for the feedback.