Its not exactly equivalent, but having spent the last month debugging a nightmare of C++ template meta programming mixed with a lot of C macros... I think things like this can be nice if they’re applied tastefully but I wouldn’t trust 99% of programmers to be judicious with these things. As someone else said, it’s catnip to a certain type of coder. It also creates a really nasty implicit dependency — you can’t pull out individual components because they’re dependent on the DSL, and who knows what dependencies the DSL pulls in? I would actually argue that macros might be why Lisp didn’t become mainstream; it creates a lot of fragmentation. Most people don’t even want to learn the syntax of their build system, asking them to learn some weird language extensions they can’t take to their next job seems like a rough sell
Edit: one more thing I forgot to add: this is a nightmare for tooling. I know there’s the contingent that wonders why you’d ever want anything more than vim or emacs, but for the rest of us, this just means refactoring/code navigation/syntax highlighting/autocomplete/static code analysis are totally broken.
Edit: one more thing I forgot to add: this is a nightmare for tooling. I know there’s the contingent that wonders why you’d ever want anything more than vim or emacs, but for the rest of us, this just means refactoring/code navigation/syntax highlighting/autocomplete/static code analysis are totally broken.