Google's speech-to-text is powerful, but I'd be pretty skeptical about tying a project to it given how services like Maps have been handled recently. There are companies like Mozilla trying to build more open solutions, but to the best of my knowledge (please correct me if I'm wrong) any pre-trained services Mozilla offers will also still involve you connecting to their servers.
Maybe I'm just paranoid, but I just can't imagine using a speech-to-text system for anything serious that I can't self-host. It feels like we've just seen example and example over and over again why this is a bad idea -- to the point that when I hear a company like Google talk about a locked-down cloud platform as "making AI accessible to everyone" it feels almost dishonest.
Especially once we start talking about text-to-speech. We can already do a lot of that locally - we should be pretty hesitant about coupling new text-to-speech techniques to strategies that require us to move logic away from local devices onto the cloud.
Maybe I'm just paranoid, but I just can't imagine using a speech-to-text system for anything serious that I can't self-host. It feels like we've just seen example and example over and over again why this is a bad idea -- to the point that when I hear a company like Google talk about a locked-down cloud platform as "making AI accessible to everyone" it feels almost dishonest.
Especially once we start talking about text-to-speech. We can already do a lot of that locally - we should be pretty hesitant about coupling new text-to-speech techniques to strategies that require us to move logic away from local devices onto the cloud.