It's the methodology, not the results or the code, that I'm suspicious of. For a highly variable task like STT, I'm sure an expert could contrive a test that gives far better results for either of the other programs tested.
That's why it would help to know why this test is comprehensive and representative enough to be considered unbiased or otherwise where its biases are. I don't have that expertise myself.
That's why it would help to know why this test is comprehensive and representative enough to be considered unbiased or otherwise where its biases are. I don't have that expertise myself.