The fine article does not make a convincing argument to opposing the copyright extension. They just whine that the record companies will "wring out more money" from pre-1972 works. If that were the whole argument, then I would actually be in favour.
It seems that the EFF position is "we want free music", and does absolutely nothing to address culture and access to culture.
It seems that the EFF position is "we want free music", and does absolutely nothing to address culture and access to culture.