I don't believe that, the confusion around the meaning of emojis are well established[0][1][2][3].
I strongly suspect that the confusion and vagueness is even more predominant in professional communications than personal. Please consider that everyday the likelihood of someone reading your code who is from a different culture or context is even higher, somethings might seem obvious to us, but that is not necessarily objectively so.
If you think I am making an argument for using plain and simple language and not just avoid emoji, you're right, that is the point.
From a pure economic point of view, considering the arguably nonexistence value emojis provide, any risk or cost is too much.
I don't believe that, the confusion around the meaning of emojis are well established[0][1][2][3].
I strongly suspect that the confusion and vagueness is even more predominant in professional communications than personal. Please consider that everyday the likelihood of someone reading your code who is from a different culture or context is even higher, somethings might seem obvious to us, but that is not necessarily objectively so.
If you think I am making an argument for using plain and simple language and not just avoid emoji, you're right, that is the point.
From a pure economic point of view, considering the arguably nonexistence value emojis provide, any risk or cost is too much.
0. https://www.businessinsider.com/science-reveals-the-most-con...
1. http://fortune.com/2016/04/14/emoji-miscommunication-study-u...
2. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3549376/Frust...
3. https://www.mrporter.com/journal/modern-problems/the-most-co...