I’m going to chime in to this very rote and dreary conversation only long enough to point out that, even in the unlikely event that “objective morality” is anything more coherent than “nuance makes me uncomfortable,” the existence or absence of “God” does not impinge on its existence. This is one of the more damning things about that whole “conversation”; the psychological need for a moral order is so great that the justification used for it is an utterly unquestioned, utterly absurd non sequitur.
I’ve just said the most interesting thing I’ve ever heard on the topic, and I’m still bored with it.
I’ve just said the most interesting thing I’ve ever heard on the topic, and I’m still bored with it.