Is the solution to this and previous side channel bugs to simply not run untrusted and trusted code on the same machine?
Basically a revert to the security model of Windows XP. We should assume access to execute any code means the same security level as having physical access to a machine (I.e. full machine ownership)?
Basically a revert to the security model of Windows XP. We should assume access to execute any code means the same security level as having physical access to a machine (I.e. full machine ownership)?