Perhaps Zuck isn't as bright as we all think? This reply is far too tech-heavy, and jargon-littered to be taken seriously as a reply to something as mainstream as the NYT.
Their PR problems aren't rooted in SV, yet that's who this is targeted to. It doesn't make (good brand) sense.
Their PR problems aren't rooted in SV, yet that's who this is targeted to. It doesn't make (good brand) sense.