> people don't understand or accept evolution [...] For example, anyone who accepts equitable distribution of attributes across genetic variances
Even if the straw-man "everybody is totally equal" can't stand up, I think there's a good argument for:
"We have to assume everybody is equal by default,(A) because we are absolutely too ignorant and limited to determine the long-term value or trade-offs within a gene or gene-combination, (B) because some diversity is itself a collective benefit to the species, and (C) because history shows most people who claimed they had the answers were often wrong and racist."
Even if the straw-man "everybody is totally equal" can't stand up, I think there's a good argument for:
"We have to assume everybody is equal by default,(A) because we are absolutely too ignorant and limited to determine the long-term value or trade-offs within a gene or gene-combination, (B) because some diversity is itself a collective benefit to the species, and (C) because history shows most people who claimed they had the answers were often wrong and racist."