If it's unethical for billionaire tech founders to focus on the needs of future generations, what moral grounding does, say, environmentalism have?
By this logic, would it not be fair to say that every dollar invested in green solutions comes at the expense of other worthy societal projects that could meaningfully change the status quo?
Those efforts are largely seen as virtuous. Seems to me the only difference here is the origin of the money: tech.
By this logic, would it not be fair to say that every dollar invested in green solutions comes at the expense of other worthy societal projects that could meaningfully change the status quo?
Those efforts are largely seen as virtuous. Seems to me the only difference here is the origin of the money: tech.