If you actually read the article and the many citations, it’s a strong data-based approach. If you only read the title or skim, or just react emotionally then it could hit you the wrong way. All of which is to say that this is an important issue, it’s presented well and with sensitivity, and it’s just the kind of thought-provoking article called for in the guidelines.
That it’s already flagged off the front page is a credit to no one.
A selection of some of the embedded links from the piece:
That it’s already flagged off the front page is a credit to no one.
A selection of some of the embedded links from the piece:
https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/amendment-proce...
https://www.ussc.gov/research/research-reports/criminal-hist...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3793850/
https://academic.oup.com/aler/article/17/1/127/212179
https://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/research-and-pu...