There's not much discussion about high ISO noise. I'd be interested to know how such a high pixel density affects that. If they could keep that desesity on a medium format sized sensor it would really be amazing and would really give large format 8x10 film a run for its money.
Hasselblad offer a 100MP 53 x 40mm sensor which they can then use to capture pseudo 400MP images. That's based on a multishot system where they can move the sensor by, I think, half a pixel by shaking the sensor. Only good for things like landscapes that don't move but still amazing.
(Also, off topic but I'm pretty sure the watch used there is an Omega Speedmaster Professional.
I'm not sure if impressed or ashamed that I can recognise it from its unbranded movement.)
Hasselblad offer a 100MP 53 x 40mm sensor which they can then use to capture pseudo 400MP images. That's based on a multishot system where they can move the sensor by, I think, half a pixel by shaking the sensor. Only good for things like landscapes that don't move but still amazing.
(Also, off topic but I'm pretty sure the watch used there is an Omega Speedmaster Professional.
I'm not sure if impressed or ashamed that I can recognise it from its unbranded movement.)