Maybe a dumb question: If 64GB chips are $6, why aren't we seeing terabyte-sized tablets and netbooks for $100 more than the baseline version? I would imagine the idle power draw is negligible and the extra size and weight well worth it.
Producers take the exact opposite approach, and use storage size as a price discriminator: a 64GB version might cost $300, while the 128GB is "only" $499, pure profit margin an order of magnitude higher than the cost of the actual storage.
Producers take the exact opposite approach, and use storage size as a price discriminator: a 64GB version might cost $300, while the 128GB is "only" $499, pure profit margin an order of magnitude higher than the cost of the actual storage.