I don't get the thought that additional unauthorised propaganda somehow changes the outcome of a voting in a negative way.
In other words who says the authorised propaganda is better or more true. The are doing the exact same and the deeper the pockets the deeper their social media influence is.
Why is it Suddenly ok that propaganda has to be authorised to be 'valid'
It's all just additional information. Isn't it the peoples job to build their own image? Do we really want to regulate what perception people get of 'things'?
I hope someone can follow what I am trying to say...
In other words who says the authorised propaganda is better or more true. The are doing the exact same and the deeper the pockets the deeper their social media influence is.
Why is it Suddenly ok that propaganda has to be authorised to be 'valid'
It's all just additional information. Isn't it the peoples job to build their own image? Do we really want to regulate what perception people get of 'things'?
I hope someone can follow what I am trying to say...