>"There is a world of difference between objective reporting and biased propaganda."
So lets examine the "propagandist" here - Bloomberg News. Selecting just a single Bloomberg tech reporter's(Sarah Frier) coverage of FB in the last year.[1]
We see stories such as:
"Sheryl Sandberg Calls for U.S. Policy Changes to Aid Working Mothers"
"Facebook Is Determined to Build Ties With Automakers"
"Facebook Hires Apple Veteran to Run Oculus VR Hardware"
"Facebook's Strategy for Augmented Reality Starts With Phones"
None of these stories contain any negative portrayal of FB. So clearly Bloomberg is not an anti-FB propagandist.
So a news organization can be a part-time propagandist then? In other words they are only producing propaganda when the story contain unflattering details about a subject?
So lets examine the "propagandist" here - Bloomberg News. Selecting just a single Bloomberg tech reporter's(Sarah Frier) coverage of FB in the last year.[1]
We see stories such as:
"Sheryl Sandberg Calls for U.S. Policy Changes to Aid Working Mothers"
"Facebook Is Determined to Build Ties With Automakers"
"Facebook Hires Apple Veteran to Run Oculus VR Hardware"
"Facebook's Strategy for Augmented Reality Starts With Phones"
None of these stories contain any negative portrayal of FB. So clearly Bloomberg is not an anti-FB propagandist.
So a news organization can be a part-time propagandist then? In other words they are only producing propaganda when the story contain unflattering details about a subject?
[1] https://www.bloomberg.com/authors/AP-41JG4_zk/sarah-frier