My recollection is all you said was "The IRS needs to come up with some sane rules surrounding this issue." There was nothing wrong with saying it, never mind the spin of replies to it.
I am stating that because removing the comment combined with your follow up comment looks weird and suspicious in a way the first comment did not to me. I would hate to see you subjected to the Streisand Effect here in a way that could have tax and legal consequences.
I am stating that because removing the comment combined with your follow up comment looks weird and suspicious in a way the first comment did not to me. I would hate to see you subjected to the Streisand Effect here in a way that could have tax and legal consequences.
Best.