> “Do not publish sexually explicit or pornographic images or videos. Writing about adult topics is permitted as long as it is not accompanied by sexually explicit images or videos, or any material that promotes or depicts unlawful or inappropriate sexual acts with children or animals. Additionally, we do not allow content that drives traffic to commercial pornography.
> We do allow naturalistic and documentary depictions of nudity (such as an image of a breastfeeding infant), as well as depictions of nudity that serve a clear educational, scientific, or artistic purpose.”
I don’t understand the fuss being made. It is clearly stated that sexual content is not allowed.
Just because sharing pornography isn’t illegal does not mean that it should be allowed on every platform on which it is possible.
Instead of violating TOS of a service they could just use a service that doesn’t prohibit pornography?
> We do allow naturalistic and documentary depictions of nudity (such as an image of a breastfeeding infant), as well as depictions of nudity that serve a clear educational, scientific, or artistic purpose.”
I don’t understand the fuss being made. It is clearly stated that sexual content is not allowed.
Just because sharing pornography isn’t illegal does not mean that it should be allowed on every platform on which it is possible.
Instead of violating TOS of a service they could just use a service that doesn’t prohibit pornography?