>While C++ had similar goals, it has the disadvantages of multiple legacy design-choices (e.g., object-oriented)
How many people agree with this statement? OO is a legacy design choice or in other words: a bad design choice.
I agree with the statement, so do most modern languages like rust and golang but I wonder what do non language designers think? This statement was given as if it was obvious but many programmers who I work with still think OO is the greatest invention ever.
How many people agree with this statement? OO is a legacy design choice or in other words: a bad design choice.
I agree with the statement, so do most modern languages like rust and golang but I wonder what do non language designers think? This statement was given as if it was obvious but many programmers who I work with still think OO is the greatest invention ever.