Comment

Comment by greenhouse_gas

I recognize the username :) .

>Despite being based on AOSP, omni/lineage/etc all have pretty different features, so usually it takes a nontrivial amount of effort to go between the two (although it's definitely less effort than starting from scratch)

I understand, the same way that Firefox and Chrome are very different, yet work on the same kernel, or are the differences between Lineage and others that deep?

So for example, Omni has athene up and running on Oreo, while despite officially being maintained (with three maintainers at that), according to Lineage OS' code review, it hasn't been worked on since last July.

So the way I see it (coming from a dev, though not a ROM dev): Android has multiple layers. It has hardware-dependent code (such as the kernel) and hardware-independent code (such as bionic or Java), sort of like in Desktop Linux you have the kernel and X, and there's bash, gnome and Firefox.

So why can't (I know how that sounds coming from the outside ... ) you take their hardware code (the kernel and whatever the Android equivalent of X is) and build on top of that? Is the whole system that integrated?

On the other hand, now that Treble officially separated the two, will it be possible to, for example, flash Omni and then flash a lineage image on top of that?

>We don't blindly support devices (even as "beta") because we have no way of verifying that everything actually works

But does every Debian maintainer (of a userspace program like, say, MySQL) have every combination of hardware? You just assume that the kernel and libc are a reliable abstraction and go from there. Is that impossible on Android?

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton