Comment Comment by Tloewald It’s worse than that:4) researcher is a serial p-hacker who even boasted about the practice5) reason given for the small sample (most recipes had changed) was a lie and sample appears to have been cherry-picked parent Tloewald 8 years ago
4) researcher is a serial p-hacker who even boasted about the practice
5) reason given for the small sample (most recipes had changed) was a lie and sample appears to have been cherry-picked