You know, it's really tiring that people keep up with the same old shtick every time the topic of embargoes and OpenBSD come up.
OpenBSD followed [0] the original embargo from the KRACK researcher, he gave OpenBSD the go-ahead to commit it.. only later we he got CERT involved did they want to delay it for more months. He changed his mind retroactively. It's even stated in the original FAQ for that particular security issue.
Enough already? This has nothing to do with Intel's very selective disclosure of Meltdown.
OpenBSD followed [0] the original embargo from the KRACK researcher, he gave OpenBSD the go-ahead to commit it.. only later we he got CERT involved did they want to delay it for more months. He changed his mind retroactively. It's even stated in the original FAQ for that particular security issue.
Enough already? This has nothing to do with Intel's very selective disclosure of Meltdown.
[0] https://lobste.rs/s/dwzplh/krack_attacks_breaking_wpa2#c_pbh...