"Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away."
Doesn't this imply that _nothing_ is always perfection. The quote just seems to be flat out wrong.
While maybe not as elegant, but wouldn't it be better said as "Perfection is achieved, not where is nothing more to add, but when there is neither more to add nor anything to take away".
Maybe the quote has a proceeding sentence that makes it clear.
Doesn't this imply that _nothing_ is always perfection. The quote just seems to be flat out wrong.
While maybe not as elegant, but wouldn't it be better said as "Perfection is achieved, not where is nothing more to add, but when there is neither more to add nor anything to take away".
Maybe the quote has a proceeding sentence that makes it clear.