No, what dang said was, "Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize." No reasonable person could possibly interpret this as meaning, "it is not possible to disagree, because a) she identified as being female, and b) said it was gross, c) it was mentioned in the context of abuse."
You are just trolling, and I am only responding because dang's comment may not be visible to other people reading this thread.
You are just trolling, and I am only responding because dang's comment may not be visible to other people reading this thread.