I have evaluated it to the best of my ability and don't believe it's a majority by any stretch. Why would I reject the null hypothesis when there is no evidence for another one?
The woman who took issue with the framing thought the Kotaku article was too hard on Atari's culture, so that only supports my argument.
The people involved don't think the behavior was shitty. It's only now, 40+ years after the fact, that people on twitter are complaining about it.
The woman who took issue with the framing thought the Kotaku article was too hard on Atari's culture, so that only supports my argument.
The people involved don't think the behavior was shitty. It's only now, 40+ years after the fact, that people on twitter are complaining about it.