2. Does not in fact even claim that everything anyone knows about global warming is wrong. (e.g.: "Everyone in the room agrees that the Earth has been getting warmer and human activity probably has something to do with it.")
3. Doesn't do much to substantiate what claims it does make.
4. Is largely about not global warming as such but possible ways to mitigate it.
5. Mostly describes the opinions of people who are not in fact climate scientists.
1. Is from 2009.
2. Does not in fact even claim that everything anyone knows about global warming is wrong. (e.g.: "Everyone in the room agrees that the Earth has been getting warmer and human activity probably has something to do with it.")
3. Doesn't do much to substantiate what claims it does make.
4. Is largely about not global warming as such but possible ways to mitigate it.
5. Mostly describes the opinions of people who are not in fact climate scientists.
6. Does purportedly give the opinions of one climate scientist, Ken Caldeira -- but it turns out that he says he's been severely misrepresented by these people; see, e.g., http://climateprogress.org/2009/10/18/error-riddled-superfre... .