Yugoslavia under Tito is a great example of a cauldron of economic and sectarian violence being temporarily held in check by a violent warlord.
Given none of those issues actually got solved during his time, the complete disintegration of his country which followed his death is a great example of actual conflict not being accurately tracked by violence figures.
Feel free to check out the development figures for the bloc countries and read up on the history. Should be instructive.
>Your second paragraph is pure logical fallacy and fully uncompelling.
Well, I haven't seen your argument demonstrating that that's the case, but from the tone of this reply, I'll have to stop responding to your points as I don't think there's very much effort towards understanding and discussion.
Given none of those issues actually got solved during his time, the complete disintegration of his country which followed his death is a great example of actual conflict not being accurately tracked by violence figures.
Feel free to check out the development figures for the bloc countries and read up on the history. Should be instructive.
>Your second paragraph is pure logical fallacy and fully uncompelling.
Well, I haven't seen your argument demonstrating that that's the case, but from the tone of this reply, I'll have to stop responding to your points as I don't think there's very much effort towards understanding and discussion.