Comment

Comment by wyager

This seems to be the (extremely unreasonable) standard held by parties who are either statistically ignorant or statistically malicious.

A vastly more reasonable standard, but easy to confuse without stats background, is e.g. http://ttic.uchicago.edu/~nati/Publications/HardtPriceSrebro...

Attempting to censor nodes in a classifier’s Bayesian network will strictly result in some combination of A) the classifier routing around the damage and B) the classifier producing worse results. Either way, we’ve accomplished nothing. The linked paper, on the other hand, still allows the classifier to be accurate without giving incorrect results across protected categories.

parent wyager 8 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton