> An 11 year history is hardly worth betting what could be the future of your company on. Especially for something just slightly more convenient than what can be built in-house.
So you can build a globally distributed, redundant, eventually consistent object store with high availability easily and conveniently and without allocating developer time that could be better used building..oh I don't know, the actual business logic? Not to mention ongoing maintenance and its expense.
It's ridiculous to suggest that the entirety of the AWS offering is something that is just slightly more convenient than what could be built in house.
So you can build a globally distributed, redundant, eventually consistent object store with high availability easily and conveniently and without allocating developer time that could be better used building..oh I don't know, the actual business logic? Not to mention ongoing maintenance and its expense.
It's ridiculous to suggest that the entirety of the AWS offering is something that is just slightly more convenient than what could be built in house.